The Clean Power Plan Protects Our Health & Our Air
中国科学家的声音
( 注意：前半段有 CO2 和地球溫度變化的資料 )
全球暖化大騙局
The Great Global Warming Swindle 2007 3 8
Global Warming Hoax, Best Document Ever
Global Warming / Climate Change Hoax
Top 10 Climate Change Lies Exposed
Climate Change: What Do Scientists Say?
( 注意：前半段有 CO2 和地球溫度變化的資料 )
The Great Global Warming Swindle 2007 3 8
Global Warming Hoax, Best Document Ever
- Dr. Roy Spencer
Bjorn Lomborg: Global priorities bigger
than climate change
Related articles：
1. Obama Calls for 30
Percent Reduction in Power Plant Emissions.
2. Obama's climate policy is 'practically worthless', says expert
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/obamas-climate-policy-practically-worthless-says-expert
3. Climategate：the Conservative backlash begins
4. Climategate：how the MSM reported the greatest scandal in modern science ( The Telegraph )
Here's what the Times has had to say on the subject:
E-mails allegedly written by some of the world’s leading climate
scientists have been stolen by hackers and published on websites run by climate
change sceptics.The sceptics claim that the e-mails are evidence that scientists
manipulated data in order to strengthen their argument that human activities
were causing global warming.
5. The Dragon's Dissent Part II：Carbon Tax As A Trade Weapon
Related articles：
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/obamas-climate-policy-practically-worthless-says-expert
3. Climategate：the Conservative backlash begins
http://libertygibbert.com/2010/08/23/the-dragons-dissent-part-ii-carbon-tax-as-a-trade-weapon/
6. Low Carbon Plot, or Why Cancun Has Already Failed
7. Global Warming from CO2, All Politics - No Science ( by Robert A, Ashworth, Source：Principia Scientific International )
Based on real data
evaluation, CO2 causing global warming was completely contrived. The
lesson to the world here is, when it comes to science; never blindly accept an
explanation from a politician or scientists who have turned political for their
own private gain. Many scientists, including the author, see global warming
from CO2 as a cruel global swindle to eliminate fossil fuels, so that a
few, at the expense of the many average people, can reap huge profits from
either carbon taxes or alternative fuels. Science is a search for truth – nothing
else; when scientific truth is trashed for personal gain, the world is in deep
trouble!
8. 針對全球變暖學說的反駁 ( 王俊鵬 )
http://wenku.baidu.com/view/823e27e519e8b8f67c1cb9c2.html
9. 中國近五千年來氣候變遷的初步研究 ( 竺可楨：中國科學院 )
9. 中國近五千年來氣候變遷的初步研究 ( 竺可楨：中國科學院 )
杜牧《過華清宮》
回覆刪除長安回望繡成堆，山頂千門次第開。
一騎紅塵妃子笑，無人知是荔枝來。
眾所皆知，荔枝是廣東的特產。從廣東嶺南到長安至少有 1,000公里，就算用快馬運送至少要四至五天，而荔枝是極難保鮮的水果，四至五天荔枝已開始腐爛，那麼楊貴妃吃的荔枝是從那裡來的？
我相信杜牧不會這麼無聊，為了作詩而講大話或這麼斗膽和唐明皇的愛妃開玩笑。
根據中國古氣象資料，可以推斷隋唐至五代期間，中國正處於氣候溫暖的時期。在唐代，如四川的成都、忠州一帶，可能是有荔枝生長的。楊貴妃在四川長大，因她嗜食荔枝，唐明皇為了討好她，有可能命人用快馬在一兩天內，從她的家鄉運送荔枝到長安。及後至南宋時期，中國北方的溫度轉冷，已無法再種植荔枝，荔枝便從此在四川一帶絕跡，令不知氣候變化的後人質疑楊貴妃吃的荔枝是從那裡來的。
從楊貴妃的故事中，可推想從唐到宋，中國正經歷一個氣溫顯著下降時期。但在氣候溫暖的隋唐代，那時並沒有汽車、飛機和發電廠，又那裡排放那麼多二氧化碳呢？
Human Made Emissions of Carbon Dioxide ( Source：Principia Scientific International )
回覆刪除" Do you realize that CO2 emissions created by man's activities, combustion of fuels, etc. (called anthropogenic emissions) is miniscule compared to the emissions of CO2 from nature? Table 1 was developed by the IPCC. It shows annual CO2 emissions to the atmosphere from both nature and man and how much of the CO2 emitted is re-absorbed by nature.
TABLE 1. GLOBAL SOURCES AND ABSORPTION OF CO2
Carbon Dioxide ( Natural )：770000 ( Annual Million Metric Tons ) = 97.1% of Total
Carbon Dioxide ( Human Made )：23100 ( Annual Million Metric Tons ) = 2.9% of Total
Carbon Dioxide ( Absorption )：781400 ( Annual Million Metric Tons ) = 98.5% of Total
Source: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, (Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press, 2001), Figure 3.1, p. 188.
Using the table above in combination with a total concentration of 392 ppmv of CO2 seen in the atmosphere in December 2011, one sees that the increase in CO2 caused by all of man's activities amounted to only 11.5 ppmv. The amount of CO2 from man is a mouse milk quantity compared to nature's emissions. If we eliminated worldwide, all manmade CO2 emissions, we would go back to the level in December 2005 and it was warmer then than in December 2011.
Nature absorbs 98.5% of the CO2 that is emitted by nature and man. As CO2 increases in the atmosphere, nature causes plant growth to increase via photosynthesis which is an endothermic (cooling) reaction. For every pound of biomass formed some 10,000 Btu are removed from the atmosphere. CO2 is absorbed, and oxygen is liberated. Further, a doubling of CO2 will increase the photosynthesis rate by 30 to 100%, depending on temperature and available moisture. More CO2 is absorbed by the plants due to the increased concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere available for conversion to carbohydrates. Nature therefore has in place a built-in mechanism to regulate the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere that will always completely dwarf man's feeble attempts to regulate it. Further, no regulation is necessary because CO2 is not a pollutant; it is part of the animal-plant life cycle. Without it, life would not exist on earth."